21 Mar
2008
21 Mar
'08
10:53 a.m.
Hello, On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 03:58:00PM +0100, Filiz Yilmaz wrote:
PDP Number: 2008-02 Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR
I am opposing to this PDP. I have already seen that customers of a LIR announce the LIRs /32 because the LIR isnt interested in deploying IPv6. One may describe this as a (probably illegal) transfer of resources. Fulfilling the PDP will open a whole new can of worms if there arent some other prerequisites met. MfG/regards, -- Rico Gloeckner System Engineer team(ix) GmbH Suedwestpark 35 90449 Nuernberg Amtsgericht Nuernberg, HRB 18320 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Oliver Kuegow, Richard Mueller