Anno domini 2016 David Croft scripsit:
On 21 October 2016 at 12:55, Maximilian Wilhelm <max@rfc2324.org> wrote:
Anno domini 2016 David Croft scripsit:
I note that the "New policy text" does not specify the replacement text for the "Contractual Requirements"
That doesn't seem neccessary as the point in question - the definiton of a sub-assignment - is specified in the new version of ripe-655.
What are you missing?
It appears in the "Current policy text" section, which implied that it was going to be changed in the "New policy text" section, but I guess it's just there for context then.
Yes, indeed. I quoted that part as it is relavant context for the change and holds the point in questions. Best Max -- "Wer nicht mehr liebt und nicht mehr irrt, der lasse sich begraben." -- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe