is there any feedback on this proposal? While it is more a clarification than an actual policy change, then it might clear some confusion to create assignments for LIR own infrastructure within their allocation.
From: "Marco Schmidt" <
mschmidt@ripe.net>
To: "address-policy-wg" <
address-policy-wg@ripe.net>
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 3:00:50 PM
Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2019-01 New Policy Proposal (Clarification of Definition for "ASSIGNED PA")
Dear colleagues,
A new RIPE Policy proposal, 2019-01, "Clarification of Definition for
"ASSIGNED PA"" is now available for discussion.
This proposal aims to make it clear in the IPv4 Policy that the status
"ASSIGNED PA" can also be used for assignments to an LIR's infrastructure.
You can find the full proposal at:
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-01
As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this
four week Discussion Phase is to discuss the proposal and provide
feedback to the proposer.
At the end of the Discussion Phase, the proposer, with the agreement of
the WG Chairs, will decide how to proceed with the proposal.
We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to
<
address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 15 February 2019.
Regards,
Marco Schmidt
Policy Officer
RIPE NCC