8 May
2006
8 May
'06
3:01 p.m.
On Monday 08 May 2006 06:28, Florian Weimer wrote:
In the latter case, a rather significant fee is needed to turn global inconvenience into a local one.
An arbitrary fee, specifically designed to block someone's entry into *any* market, is *illegal*, at least in any non-communist country that I know. I also don't understand the whole decision circling back, endlessly, to restrictive policies when nobody actually seems to want IPv6 (assuming this is still what we're talking about) rgds, s.