2 Dec
2008
2 Dec
'08
5:33 p.m.
I can only second Niels here. While organizing conferences and events with network infrastructure myself, I can tell that it is a hassle to re-arrange temporary PI every time... so I do see the incentive. But why should the NCC be a special case and no one else?
I agree that it would be fairer to change the policy so that any conference organizer can apply for a PI IPv6 address block. They fill the role of a network operator for the attendees of a conference and this should be sufficient justification. IPv6 address space is NOT in short supply and we should not treat it as a scarce resource at this time. --Michael Dillon