30 Sep
2013
30 Sep
'13
3:39 p.m.
Hi Richard, On 9/27/13 9:25 AM, Richard Hartmann wrote:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no> wrote:
However, as I've already pointed out, the new "Sponsored LIR" class of End Users introduced by this proposal doesn't really fit the original definition. (RFC 7020 uses the terms "child LIRs" / "sub-LIRs" instead.)
Sponsored/Sponsoring LIR is easy to confuse.
Child LIR does not easily expand (Grandchild LIR?).
A Sub-LIR can, if need be, have a Sub-Sub-LIR.
that sounds like a good idea, I'll talk to the co-authors about this option. cheers, elvis