23 Jun
2004
23 Jun
'04
1:10 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2004-06-23, at 13.03, Masataka Ohta wrote:
Based on this it was proposed to concentrate on solutions that are either "fat-ip" or wedgelayers at layer "3.5".
So, it is simply wrong.
I am simply referring the conclusions of the interim meeting on the request of the WG co-chair. Values of this being right or wrong, or other comments on various proposals to the multi6 problem belong in the multi6 WG. Not here (which I am sure the WG chairs will agree with). - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBQNllQaarNKXTPFCVEQIiTwCdGGiZVRjT5YA/LoyJU/H/+1KGVRYAoMWv OfxW6NYkpRMc66u8JunqmgL/ =1/8r -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----