Gert Doering, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 03:08:57PM +0200, Shane Kerr wrote:
In the meantime, we do not want to delay the implementation of the Sub-Allocation policy. For that reason we'd like to have an interim status attribute value for that.
I like that.
Proposal:
Add "SUB-ALLOCATED PA" to the allowed "status:" values.
That would be in agreement with the original proposal, so "I like that" (obviously).
"SUB-ALLOCATED PA" inetnum object may have an "ALLOCATED PA" or an "LIR-PARTITIONED PA" less specific inetnum object.
A range of IP's can only have a single "SUB-ALLOCATED PA" in it. That is, you cannot sub-allocate twice.
I wouldn't force that on anyone. It might not always make sense, but we have at least one reseller that has a re-selling customer - so a two-level structure is already in place.
So "please don't do that".
Okay, this makes sense. This restriction will not be added. -- Shane Kerr RIPE NCC