Let me try to understand: (A) We don't disagree that he might actually deserve more than /32 (B) According to my understanding of previous discussions I had on this topic, RIPE might actually have already reserved extra space for his future needs (C) According to the current rules he can't get another /32 for a total of /31 without using most of the current /32 (and hoping his next /32 will be adjacent) (D) Someone is seriously suggesting he returns the current /32 and asks for a brand new /31 which he will likely get. Was someone reading too much Kafka or The Good Soldier Ċ vejk lately? Ivan
-----Original Message----- From: Jan Zorz @ Go6.si [mailto:jan@go6.si] Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 5:13 PM To: Ivan Pepelnjak; 'Sander Steffann'; 'Yannis Nikolopoulos' Subject: RE: [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
Going to production it was said :)
I did a long discussion with Alex Le Heux (RIPE IPRA) about the same issue, his advice was that.
Jan
Ivan Pepelnjak <ipepelnjak@gmail.com> wrote:
Extremely helpful advice from the ops perspective.
Trade in your /32 and get something bigger under initial alloc conditions... :)
-- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.