Hi, On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 04:52:14PM +0200, Dpto. Datos Television Costa Blanca wrote:
Oh please, stop that. I just only said that 5 or 6 ppl is not consensous. If you all wish, I did the math. 7 (counting you) of 3000 is 0.23% and the list have more than 3k subscribers. Im not going that way because if we start with that, not a single proposal would be accepted.
You'll *have* to go that way, as this is the way RIPE policy making works. Only actual statements are evaluated, and if all you get is 7 people disagreeing with the idea, it does not matter if 100, 3000, or 5 million other people do not say anything about it. If you look at the archives, you'll see that it's quite different for different proposals - some ideas get much/only positive feedback right away (and in that case, 5 people telling us "yeah, go for it!" is also clear enough, as 2995 others do not find it necessary to say "I'm against it! stop!"), other ideas cause long discussions, eventually leading to the opponents being convinced - and yet other proposals come up, get strong headwind, and are withdrawn because it's clear that there is not enough support. This is not voting, this is "rough consensus", similar to RFC7282. Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279