No immeadiate objections other than nothing really changes here (i.e if the user has any legacy or non-RIPE NCC space then they can simply claim it is "full")

Also, note the policy only strives to document, not to instruct on how such matters are dealt with other than in the context of address consumption, does nothing to help people get off historical space for instance.

------------------------------------------------
David Freedman
Group Network Engineering
Claranet Limited
http://www.clara.net



-----Original Message-----
From: address-policy-wg-admin@ripe.net on behalf of Scott Leibrand
Sent: Mon 7/27/2009 20:33
To: address-policy-wg@ripe.net
Cc: policy-announce@ripe.net
Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2008-07 Discussion Period extended until 24 August 2009 (Ensuring efficient use of historical IPv4 resources)

Good catch.  I support the change, and the proposal.

-Scott

Ingrid Wijte wrote:
> PDP Number: 2008-07
> Ensuring efficient use of historical IPv4 resources
>
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> The Discussion Period for the proposal 2008-07 has been extended until 24 August 2009.
>
> The text of the policy proposal 2008-07 has been revised.
>
> We have published the new version (version 3) today. In the new version, new members, requesting an initial allocation, are also asked about the utilisation and documentation of all address resources they hold, including pre-RIR registrations. In version 2 this was only proposed for additional allocations.
>
> You can find the full proposal at:
>
>     http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2008-07.html
>
> As a result a new Discussion Phase is set for the proposal.
>
> We encourage you to review this policy proposal and send your comments
> to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net>.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ingrid Wijte
> Policy Development Officer
> RIPE NCC
>
>