Hi, On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:10:47AM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
[I wonder where the policy discussion went....]
Well said. While I do quite enjoy the occasional IPv6/IPv4 advocacy discussion, I would indeed prefer to keep *this* list a bit more focused on *address policy related* topics: - developments that have impact on RIPE address policy work (so the economic views would fall into this) - weak points or operational problems with the current RIPE policies - not-yet-formal ideas for improving RIPE policy - comments to ongoing RIPE policy proposals "Whether or not IPv6 is technically superior to IPv4" is considered off-topic, as it has no real impact on our work: defining policies that help giving numbers to all those that need some, in a fair and impartial way. We need policies for those that want IPv6 numbers, and we need policies for those that want some of the remaining IPv4 numbers. thanks. Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 128645 SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279