24 Nov
2010
24 Nov
'10
9:59 p.m.
On 24 Nov 2010, at 20:51, Dmitry Burkov wrote:
On 24.11.10 22:38, Remco Van Mook wrote:
Well, rip-123 will always be correctly addressed as ripe-123. It's just that ripe- doc-1234 would could be called ripe-1234. I don't see any confusion arising from that and the normal document churn would take care of any potential confusion, anyway. The confusion is that, for the next 25 years or so, people will be wondering what the relation is between ripe-<foo> and ripe-doc-<bar> documents. Which one replaces which other one?
So again, please don't. Agreed, as don't see any real needs and only future problems.
+1 Joao