Hi Sebastian By RIPE NCC policy definition you are right. In reality there IPv4. If there wasn't, there shouldn't have been IPv4 trades. When demands could not get satisfied, then there won't be anymore IPv4 -----Original Message----- From: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-bounces@ripe.net] On Behalf Of Sebastian Wiesinger Sent: June 17, 2016 5:10 PM To: Payam Poursaied <payam@rasana.net> Cc: 'Sander Steffann' <sander@steffann.nl>; address-policy-wg@ripe.net Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy) * Payam Poursaied <payam@rasana.net> [2016-06-17 13:00]:
My suggesting is instead of removing the main problem (i.e. "lack of IPv4 for those who need"), please bring policies on the table which help those who really require IP, can get IP.
THERE. IS. NO. IPv4. LEFT! Sebastian -- GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A 9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE) 'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE SCYTHE. -- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant