Moin, thank you all for your feedback on 2024-01. With the discussion slot coming up at RIPE-89, I wanted to share some considerations on how the various suggestions from the ML could be addressed ahead of time, so we can go for a more active on-site discussion. I put the changes into git again: https://git.as59645.net/tfiebig/ripe-738-pi-update/src/branch/draft-09/draft... Specifically, I saw the following core-points: - Concerns about the interaction with the charging scheme I clarified again, that charging scheme discussions are out of scope, also illustrating the voiced concerns and that--ultimately--the same effect is already present with the current version of the policy. - Concerns regarding various terms and handling of PA vs. PI The purpose for changes to 2.9 and 5.4 have been explained in more detail in the associated considerations. Furthermore, some clarifications have been integrated into the text. I also made clear that the purpose is the defragmentation of the registry. - Concerns voiced regarding evaluation of renumbering requests The policy now clearly discusses how and under which conditions renumbering is necessary, and when which prefixes need to be handed back, including methods to reduce the impact on End Users that may face, e.g., renumbering, i.e., allowing the withdrawel of a request if it would otherwise cause renumbering. I am looking forward to further discussions on the list, as well as to a lively discussion at the upcoming meeting. With best regards, Tobias