On 11 May 2016, at 08:53, Riccardo Gori <rgori@wirem.net> wrote:
Sander noticed there are people here that are confirming that a change is accepted and someone else noticed that 2015-05 can be re-written or re-invented to meet better the tasks You as a chair should accept this and should help the community to understand how to follow up with a reasonable solution
The WG’s co-chairs have not expressed an opinion on this proposal. This is to be expected since they have to make the consensus determination if 2015-05 reaches that point. Others have pointed out flaws and raised substantial objections. These issues have not been answered, let alone resolved. Supporters of 2015-05 should accept this and should help the community to understand how to follow up with a reasonable solution. We’re waiting. PS: Apologies for a relevant and meaningful Subject: header.