(apologise for being slightly OT) -----Original Message----- From: address-policy-wg-admin@ripe.net [mailto:address-policy-wg-admin@ripe.net] On Behalf Of Nils Ketelsen
You seem to have a very easy Job,
65% of my day goes to doing stuff a machine could have done. 20% goes to developing software/hardware so the machine can do it instead of us. The rest are coffee breaks and meetings.
when you can make this proper policy for your customers.
I can not, those (about) 100 connecting to my network all have different policies, different needs, different requirements. And we do our best, to fullfill their needs and make it as easy for them as
Some demand it, a few don't, but they all ask. possible. I didn't mention it would be in violation to your customers existing policies/needs. You automatically assumed so without even thinking/knowing how it can be implemented.
We call that "service". I surely would call that service, yes. Automatic renumbering service. I bet at least 5 people stole my idea just now.
If you do not have to provide this, good for you. What, service?
But please do not tell me, that my need to have paying customers is bad design. If your intentions are to get _any_ potential customer, then you obviously need to loosen up on policies as they all have special needs. In that case, I understand you completely. (I dropped a comment here on how not to get huge amount of customers when you adjust policies on demand per customer case)
Nils, not in the ISP-Business
j, in the ISP-business (with friends)