18 Jun
2016
18 Jun
'16
11:41 p.m.
+1 On 19.06.2016 0:38, Daniel Suchy wrote:
Do we really want do block new organisations with new allocations, but allow old (happy) one to do anything with addresses tehy have...? That's not fair.
+1
There're organisations, which have large allocations and they're sometimes not taking care - they have enough IPv4 addresses, nothing is pushing them to implement IPv6, or save address space by implementation of some NAT solution. If they decide to sell their business, policy will allow that - but, if "new" resource holder will try similar thing, policy will ban then?
Yuri@NTX