Hi, On 24/09/2013 20:05, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
On what possible grounds do you assume that our "+1" supports are EASY?
Because it's so short to write and not develop :-) +1 and you're done here. -1 requires long developments and a lot of repetition, as you may have noticed. But it is the game, OK, support is easier to formulate. This comes from the system of someone writing a proposal and this is a "positive" move, so going the counterway requires more writing (and may might seem counter-productive) while going the same direction obviously does not require to re-write the "pro" arguments that are already in the proposal. This is where I regret by the way, the assymetry between supporting and opposing arguments in the rationale.
You imply that only you have thought this through, and that those who just state that they agree have not. I find this unnecessarly offensive, that you cannot state your arguments without making such implication.
OK I must admit this is was bit rude, so please accept my apologies. But this was not intedned as personal offense, I appreciate when I am on the other side an just need to say +1 :-) Best regards, Sylvain