On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Scott Leibrand wrote:
Good catch. I support the change, and the proposal.
-Scott
I support the proposal only partially. No objections to "LIR should be asked about the utilisation of all address resources ..." I'm against the position about "documentation of all address resources they hold, including pre-RIR registrations". The "documentation" in pre-RIR times did not look like "forms for gathering the required information", with "network infrastructure and future plans" from ripe-471 (6.1.). They only contained a template for db and that's all. To fulfil the proposed policy, I have to turn to customers of pre-rir /16s and ask them "all" to re-right their request forms to ripe-381. Which is hardly possible. LIR that holds pre-rir registrations is unable to provide the "documentation of all ... pre-RIR registrations" as the policy proposal demands. With respect, Larisa Yurkina -------------- RIPN Registry Center
Ingrid Wijte wrote:
PDP Number: 2008-07 Ensuring efficient use of historical IPv4 resources
Dear Colleagues,
The Discussion Period for the proposal 2008-07 has been extended until 24 August 2009.
The text of the policy proposal 2008-07 has been revised.
We have published the new version (version 3) today. In the new version, new members, requesting an initial allocation, are also asked about the utilisation and documentation of all address resources they hold, including pre-RIR registrations. In version 2 this was only proposed for additional allocations.
You can find the full proposal at:
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2008-07.html
As a result a new Discussion Phase is set for the proposal.
We encourage you to review this policy proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net>.
Regards,
Ingrid Wijte Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC
--- RIPN Registry center -----