6 Nov
2012
6 Nov
'12
8:05 p.m.
On 06/11/2012 18:35, Tore Anderson wrote:
True. I didn't mean to suggest that this propsal, if amended, could not reach consensus at some point in the future. My main message was that telling one's customers to sit around and wait for that to happen is really bad advice, unless it comes with a big fat warning that the waiting period may be very long, possibly even infinite.
There's no "may" about it. The waiting period _will_ be long. 2012-04 will have to go back to initial discussion phase, and the journey from there to policy takes a minimum of 19 weeks. That's assuming it's all plain sailing. Nick