Hi! On 01/18/2012 07:15 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
I'd be very interested to hear more on your ideas about how to define fairness. I've tried myself on a number of a occasions to come up with some clear ideas about what constitutes "fair" in an environment of scarcity, but unfortunately have made very little progress.
I believe defining fairness is undoubtedly always a challenging issue. But as i already wrote: dividing into groups and handling them unequally is _definitely_ an increase in unfairness. So what i can define in the issue at hand is: It is more fair not to introduce privileges for such groups than otherwise. So let's just not make IXPs/ISPs more equal than others.
would you be able to share them? The second last /8 will run out in the next couple of months, and we're going to have the most unholy bunfight when it does. Obviously it would be much better to come up with a final
Humm - we're talking about a proposal to make a small group special in the mentioned case: We are already in the unholy bunfight (cheers!). But you asked about the "IPv4 depletion" issue. As you seem interested, as a little hint, just take a look e.g. into the first /2 ... And there are a lot more issues of that kind... Regards, Chris