Hi, On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:09:32AM +0100, David Freedman wrote:
Agree, i've always treated such requests from PI Applicants as valid "infrastructure" purpose, NCC have always agreed, surely this is a non-issue?
Well, the question came up on this list (on whether "web server hosting" would be a valid purpose for IPv6 PI), and it seem that other people had issues requesting IPv4 PI for customers that do "web server hosting". So at least some clarification might be helpful, if only to help the hostmasters (IPRAs) to cause less irritation due to different interpretations on both sides... Maybe we can get a few words from the NCC on how PI requests are evaluated in the context of "we want to run web servers in that space" today? Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 128645 SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279