On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Emilio Madaio <emadaio@ripe.net> wrote:
Thank you for the notification. The draft policy text has been
corrected.
Could you adapt the side-by-side version [1] as well please? The actual diff is more or less trivial as seen in the attachment.
It's needlessly complicated to see the actual difference at a glance.
I'll gladly collect your feedback to take action upon it.
How does this process work, exactly? As implied by my initial email, I already tried to help improve this process in the past?
Is there a phase of public review of options or similar? Are issues that may block adoption of new techniques documented publicly? Other than suggesting a change, what can the community do to influence or help with this process?