On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Alexey Galaev <alex@vpsville.ru> wrote:

I’m inclined to disagree with proposal I used to see and I have a different take on it.

We have the main problem: there are no IPv4 address space for all. This proposal just take privilege to old LIR's and limit in rights all new LIR's. But this does not solve the problem. We need to use IPv4 more effectively and stimulate to use IPv6. Why can't we add some payment for ALL current IPv4 blocks?

Because this group decides address policy, not membership fees.

For example, 0.5$/year for IP. All unusable IPv4 will be returned as unprofitable. What the difference between unused space from last /8 and unused space from first /8?

The difference is that there is no "unused space from first /8".

And what the differnce between old and new LIR's?

The difference appears to be that the old LIRs wanted new LIRs to have a chance to exist, while new LIRs do not want new LIRs to exist.

Jan