Hello, On 10/22/2015 11:52 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 09:27:37AM +0330, Saeed Khademi wrote:
Are we talking about IPV4 and IPV6, or we are talking about how Iran is managing it's address space? Since people are argueing that this proposal is necessary because IPv6 cannot be deployed in Iran, some relation seem to exist... I don't see the connection between IPv6 not being available ..and the need of IPv4. If these two protocols would be interchangeable I would understand, but given the circumstances I think there are two distinct needs: the need of IPv4 and the need of IPv6.
(And indeed, it helps understanding why someone argues in favour or against a proposal if he or she explains the personal background - the RIPE service region is so large and so many different countries that something which is totally obvious for some needs explaining for others. So it's also good practice to try to listen what other people are saying, and trying to understand what they say :-) )
Gert Doering -- APWG chair