Hi, On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 02:54:59PM +0200, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Dan Luedtke <maildanrl@gmail.com> wrote:
<provoking>I don't see how anyone can be against this proposal.</provoking>
I don't see the real world benefit of the proposal, there are insufficient arguments for it, and I'm therefore with Tore on this one.
(So now you perhaps see how anyone _can_ be against it.)
Uh. Can you please be a bit more explicit, as not everybody might remember Tore's stance on this? I take it that you are opposing the proposal? Any variant of the proposal, or would you support the "publish, but anonymize rejected transfers" option? It's a bit hard for the chairs to figure out which way to go if opinions are not stated clearly... thanks, Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279