Hi, On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 09:35:17PM +0200, Carsten Schiefner wrote:
you still seem to be a bit stressed out - no relaxing weekend?! ;-)
Not that much... conflicting appointments on the weekend right after the RIPE meeting... I thought I had enough sleep, but seems not.
On 21.10.2013 20:40, Gert Doering wrote:
But I think we have found another volunteer for the minimum allocation size obstacle regarding IPv4 PA->PI conversion. Also related to IPv4 PI, but differently...
This should read "regarding IPv4 PI->PA conversion" - as it concerns converting "ASSINGED PI" IPv4 space of LIRs into "ALLOCATED PA" space for the respective LIR.
Yeah, of course. Sorry.
The (main) question here is: what to do with PI space that is smaller than the minimum allocation size.
"Just permitting the conversion" ("in one piece, not to be fragmented further") would be one option :-) - no extra routing table impact, no extra address space consumption, and possibly improved documentation. But that's not for me to decide, it's for you to propose and for the WG to decide :-) (but it matches what I read here). Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279