Hi NIck, Fully agree with you. I didn’t say “the authors don’t like the arguments against” I said we didn’t see up to now arguments opposing and we are happy to hear them from the community and obviously take any necessary measures to improve the proposal. Tks! Regards, Jordi @jordipalet
El 30 oct 2024, a las 11:50, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> escribió:
In relation to the discussion at the microphone in today's APWG session, a policy proposal is a working group proposal. If there are arguments against a proposal, there is an implicit requirement to acknowledge these arguments.
It is not relevant that the authors don't like those arguments.
There are a lot of reasons for this, including objectivity and consensus. But it is also important document the decision-making process so that we have a future record of how decision about policy decisions are made, and what was considered. If we don't have that written record, we will lose the institutional knowledge of why policies say what they say.
Nick
----- To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/address-policy-wg.ripe.net/ As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the email matching your subscription before you can change your settings. More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/
********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.