On 1/11/12 3:42 PM, Martin Stanislav wrote:
I think the price difference in LIR membership will probably make them think - more resources, bigger LIR ;)
That's something for a requester to think about.
Hi, Exactly. It's up to how we define charging schema, but basically, yes, you are right.
The minimal change Nick talks about above and tracking the reason of usage is also of possible interest to the rest of the community. Well it rather seems like a minority of it so far.
The proposed policy change reads like this: No questions asked if the requested IPv6 address space size (to be) allocated to a LIR is>=/32&& <=/29 whatever the intended usage reason is, e.g. the LIR's customer base size, a need for a transition technology. Have I missed anything ?
No. That's correct understanding. :) Cheers, Jan