2 May
2007
2 May
'07
5:03 p.m.
All, I think the draft this proposal refers to: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipv6-ula-central-01 Is an early version of what eventually became RFC 4193: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4193 The RFC does not have any centrally assigned addresses. I didn't actually follow the discussion in the IETF about this document, so I don't know why the centrally assigned version was removed. It's not actually clear to me what the policy proposal is. Does it intend for the RIPE NCC to act as a central registry for all local IPv6 addresses? Does it intend for a special membership category be set up for this? -- Shane