You have already been pointed at: https://version6.ru/isp.

My, perhaps too optimistic prognosis, is that we'll have IPv6 as a mainstream IP protocol by 2018. The figures of the current growth make me believe in this.

On 06/13/16 20:04, NTX NOC wrote:
Agree,

Almost in Russia, very big country with a lot of ISPs - I can't find any
big home ISP who gives IPv6 by default.
Most of ISPs get there Ipv6 blocks and play with it. But it's not so
good for customers. ISPs prefer still to get IPv4 blocks in additional
to the space they have but not to switch to IPv6.

IPv6 will grow very slow in additional with IPv4.
So those protocols will live together for long-long time and we need to
spend some time for IPv4 as well.


Yuri

On 12.06.2016 18:30, Arash Naderpour wrote:
As an example in Iran there is only one exit point (AS12880 and AS48159
belongs to one organization) from country to global carriers controlled
by government and as they have no LI platform yet on IPv6 there is
simply no IPv6 service availability or possibility for Iranian service
providers.

 

There is no possibility to have a direct peering with a global carrier
and as a result no native IPv6 connectivity yet.  there is also no IXP
in the country.

 

As I said it is not about the difficulty of deploying IPv6, when it is
not lawful and is not available to ISPs they have to stick with IPv4.
Please refer to ripe ncc lab report and see some IPv4 import figures
https://labs.ripe.net/Members/wilhelm/developments-in-ipv4-transfers

 

Arash

P.S last month they started advertising of the IPv6 blocks but no plan
to provide a service to ISPs as yet.

 

*From:*address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-bounces@ripe.net] *On
Behalf Of *Sergey
*Sent:* Monday, 13 June 2016 1:10 AM
*To:* address-policy-wg@ripe.net
*Subject:* Re: [address-policy-wg] ***CAUTION_Invalid_Signature*** Re:
IPv4 reserved space

 

Global carriers provide that connectivity. What's the problem?

On 06/12/16 18:08, Arash Naderpour wrote:

    I was not talking about a global carrier and if they can provide
    IPv6 or not, It was about availability and possibilities to have
    IPv6 connectivity everywhere. There are two different subject.

     

    Arash

     

    *From:*Dominik Nowacki [mailto:dominik@clouvider.co.uk]
    *Sent:* Monday, 13 June 2016 12:42 AM
    *To:* Arash Naderpour <arash_mpc@parsun.com>
    <mailto:arash_mpc@parsun.com>
    *Cc:* Alexander Koeppe <Alexander.Koeppe@merckgroup.com>
    <mailto:Alexander.Koeppe@merckgroup.com>; address-policy-wg@ripe.net
    <mailto:address-policy-wg@ripe.net>
    *Subject:* Re: [address-policy-wg] ***CAUTION_Invalid_Signature***
    Re: IPv4 reserved space

     

    Not available ?

     

    Please name a global carrier that does not support IPv6.

    With Kind Regards, 

    Dominik Nowacki 
     
    Clouvider Limited is a limited company registered in England and
    Wales. Registered number: 08750969 <tel:08750969>. Registered
    office: 88 Wood Street, London, United Kingdom, EC2V 7RS. Please
    note that Clouvider Limited may monitor email traffic data and also
    the content of email for the purposes of security and staff
    training. This message contains confidential information and is
    intended only for the intended recipient. If you do not believe you
    are the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or
    copy this e-mail. Please notify abuse@clouvider.net
    <mailto:abuse@clouvider.net> of this e-mail immediately by e-mail if
    you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from
    your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure
    or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost,
    destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Clouvider
    Limited nor any of its employees therefore does not accept liability
    for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which
    arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is
    required please request a hard-copy version. 


    On 12 Jun 2016, at 16:40, Arash Naderpour <arash_mpc@parsun.com
    <mailto:arash_mpc@parsun.com>> wrote:

        And I don't understand why some people think that everyone can
        deploy IPv6,
        it is simply not available everywhere.  
        It is not about difficulty, it is about possibility.

        Regards,

        Arash


        -----Original Message-----
        From: address-policy-wg
        [mailto:address-policy-wg-bounces@ripe.net] On
        Behalf Of Alexander Koeppe
        Sent: Monday, 13 June 2016 12:09 AM
        To: address-policy-wg@ripe.net <mailto:address-policy-wg@ripe.net>
        Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] ***CAUTION_Invalid_Signature***
        Re: IPv4
        reserved space

        I don't understand how much time and energy is being put into
        the discussion
        about keeping vintage IP alive.
        This time and energy would be better off spent in just deploying v6.
        It's just not that difficult. You just need to develop a
        stepwise approach.
        A one-shot would probably fail.

        -- Alex




            Am 11.06.2016 um 22:35 schrieb Gert Doering <gert@space.net
            <mailto:gert@space.net>>:

             

            Hi,

             

                On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 10:14:11PM +0300, NTX NOC wrote:

                About IPv6 - still now in Russia there are no Home ISPs
                who gives

                IPv6 by default to customers. Nobody wants it, nobody
                needs it.

             

            The "nobody needs it" is a misconception.  Direct your
            energy there to

            make people understand that IPv4 is game over.

             

            Gert Doering

                  -- NetMaster

            --

            have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

             

            SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v.
            Bomhard

            Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A.

        Grundner-Culemann


            D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)

            Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

            <totemomail_info.html>



        This message and any attachment are confidential and may be
        privileged or
        otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended
        recipient,
        you must not copy this message or attachment or disclose the
        contents to any
        other person. If you have received this transmission in error,
        please notify
        the sender immediately and delete the message and any attachment
        from your
        system. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and any of its
        subsidiaries do not
        accept liability for any omissions or errors in this message
        which may arise
        as a result of E-Mail-transmission or for damages resulting from any
        unauthorized changes of the content of this message and any
        attachment
        thereto. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and any of its
        subsidiaries do not
        guarantee that this message is free of viruses and does not
        accept liability
        for any damages caused by any virus transmitted therewith.



        Click http://www.merckgroup.com/disclaimer to access the German,
        French,
        Spanish and Portuguese versions of this disclaimer.


 

-- 
Kind regards,
CTO at
*Foton Telecom CJSC (ru.fotontelecom)*
Tel.: +7 (499) 679-99-99
AS42861 on PeeringDB <http://as42861.peeringdb.com/>, Qrator
<https://radar.qrator.net/as42861>, BGP.HE.NET <http://bgp.he.net/AS42861>

http://ipv6actnow.org/


    

--
Kind regards,
CTO at
Foton Telecom CJSC (ru.fotontelecom)
Tel.: +7 (499) 679-99-99
AS42861 on PeeringDB, Qrator, BGP.HE.NET

http://ipv6actnow.org/