Hi, On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 02:26:05PM +0100, Andy Furnell wrote:
I'd opt for:
c) plan to provide IPv6 connectivity to organisations and customers to which it will make assignments _according to the rules specified in section 5.4.1_, and will advertise that connectivity through its single aggregated address allocation.
just to make it clear that this change doesn't mean "/60s are fine now".
Exactly. 5.4.1 and RFC3177 are important for the sake of maintaining a coherent assignment policy, but the size of the assignments an LIR/ISP is planning on making (which we very much hope will be picked from the /48 /64 or /128 bucket as per that policy) should not impact their ability to obtain an allocation in the first place...
OK, so we're all in violent agreement, are we? :-) Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 71007 (66629) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster@Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234