5 Dec
2005
5 Dec
'05
5:34 p.m.
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 02:38:06PM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
A question which most likely only RIPE NCC can answer: has there ever been a LIR who requested an IPv6 allocation and got rejected?
LIR's are usually already have 200+ customers, let alone in planning.
The people who are complaining (and not proposing what could be done) on this list don't want to be an LIR in the first place. Removing the 200 rule thus would not have much effect in all those cases.
There are certainly organisations that cannot meet the 200 rule that have a /32.. RIPE-NCC is not inflexible. Tim::/1