-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2004-06-21, at 11.58, Carlos Morgado wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 12:41:05PM +0300, Pekka Savola wrote:
If we still agree that we don't want to give /32's to enterprises, toy ISPs without any real number of customers (hey! my consulting company has two connectivity customers as well, should I get a /32 prefix?), or such, we have to keep in some checks.
Have we figured out how to make multihoming work without giving multihomed networks their own prefix like in v4 ?
Depends on your definition of "figured out". At the multi6 WG interim meeting last week we got down to 6 proposal from 32. And I think those 6 will come down to two fairly shortly. Then all we need to do is develop and implement it... I suggest joining the multi6 mailinglist. Instructions at http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/multi6-charter.html - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBQNa0LKarNKXTPFCVEQJFMgCfUoFi2ji1/2P+IxgUH2gkx+rRbYYAn1ph iwNvR0h/6q9c5bD1ZMnTb5ao =TuZe -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----