Hi, Masataka Ohta schrieb: [...not quoting the meaningless stuff for a reason...] waering all my hats as private internet citizen, network operator for my own network, network architect for a non-commerial organisation supporting new technologies, LIR, ISP, and IT Consultant for big to large customers, i hearby state that i ... a) have operational IPv6 networks for 6 years now b) don't like NAT c) don't need NAT d) don't use NAT e) don't sell NAT if not a requirement by a customer f) don't see a reason to conserve IPv4 space g) don't see a reason not to migrate to IPv6 h) don't see a reason to handle the last IPv4 /8 any different and add more complexity policy-wise here i) don't support any more complex NAT setup than we already have in the wild now j) ..get bored by this now and stop here even though i might come up with more points ...just my 0.02EUR [yes i know, this is a destructive, polemic statement, but it fits the tone of the original suggestion somehow...] -- ======================================================================== = Sascha Lenz SLZ-RIPE slz@baycix.de = = Network Design & Operations = = BayCIX GmbH, Landshut * PGP public Key on demand * = ========================================================================