On 02.10.13 17:14, Andrew Dul wrote:
On 10/2/2013 5:58 AM, Hans Petter Holen wrote:
In August the IETF published RFC7020 "" The Internet Numbers Registry System" as a replacement for RFC2050. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7020
A question came up at today's Address Council call today: - "Does any of the global or regional policies need review following this?"
I assume not - but it could be good to have the wg participants thoughts on this too.
FYI, The ARIN region is currently working on draft policy 2013-4 as a result of RFC 2050 being moved to historical status.
LACNIC-2013-02 http://www.lacnic.net/en/web/lacnic/politicas (The idea behind this specific proposal is not to be a global, but regional - I have been told) In our policies I was pointed to ripe-592 which spells out the registry system goals in section 3.0 and RIPE policy has included similar text since the publication of ripe-136 in May 1996. -- Hans Petter Holen Mobile +47 45 06 60 54 | hph@oslo.net | http://hph.oslo.net