Hi. In RIPE-512 section 5.5 "Registration" is says: "When more than a /48 is assigned to an organisation, it must be registered in the database as a separate object with status 'ASSIGNED'." I believe the correct wording here should be "End Site" instead of organisation. If you read the wording stictly, we cannot use the AGGREGATED-BY-LIR for "organisations" with more than one /48 End Site, and I dont think this was the intention. -- Thor-Henrik Kvandahl Network Architect Telenor Norway, Snaroyvn. 30, 1331 Fornebu, Norway. On Mon, 30 May 2011, Emilio Madaio wrote:
Dear colleagues,
At RIPE 59 in Lisbon in October 2009, the RIPE NCC announced that it would undertake a project to make various RIPE policy documents easier to understand without changing the meaning of the text.
As already announced, the latest draft document produced according to the project is available at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/updated-documents/
This is the merger of the three policy documents:
-ripe-512 "IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy" -ripe-451 "IPv6 Address Space Policy for Internet Exchange Points" -ripe-233 "IPv6 Addresses for Internet Root Servers in the RIPE Region"
The announcement of the publication of this new draft is available at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/address-policy-wg/2011/msg00243....
The Address Policy Working Group co-Chairs decided to extend the review period until 13 June 2011 to allow the community more time to give their feedback.
We encourage you to read this merged version and send any comments to address-policy-wg@ripe.net by 13 June 2011.
Best Regards Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC