On 10/02/2009 12:56, Andy Davidson wrote:
There are significant advantages to passing "as is" with the aim of getting the policy passed quickly, because I do believe there are networks who are not LIRs waiting for v6 PI to be allowed in Europe.
If others agree with my premise that an organisation's status with the NCC should not be a barrier to v6 PI, I will propose the policy to fix.
policy parity with ipv4 assignment should be considered here. There is no prohibition in RIPE441 that I can find which prevents LIRs from getting PI assignments. Maybe someone else can advise me otherwise. However, this policy has been on the table for just a couple of months less than 3 years. Let's go ahead with it, as proposed, and the limitation on LIRs can be removed afterwards. Nick