16 Apr
2013
16 Apr
'13
10:53 a.m.
Hi, Tore -- On 30/03/2013 14:01, "Tore Anderson" <tore@fud.no> wrote:
In a nutshell: 2013-03 amputates the dead policy limbs. Cosmetic surgery can follow later. :-)
Cleaning stuff up is good, and this policy is a great step - thanks for bravely taking up the challenge. I support the ambition of the policy, and happy to support the current wording. Richard's English tweaks should be included as well. There was a lot of debate about whether to remove that 'conservation is an aim of the policy' at the start - I would support a 2013-03-bis which does not delete the conservation line if this is required to build consensus, but it's time to delete the legacy stuff. Andy