[address-policy-wg] Re: 2024-02 New Policy Proposal (IPv6 Initial Allocations /28)

On 18-10-2024 19:13, Peter Hessler wrote:

I think you mean 2001:3c00::/29

Yes, you are completely right, I meant|2001:3c00::/29|. However, we still have this "hole." Is there a technical reason for this?