15 May
2007
15 May
'07
12:30 p.m.
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 05:30 +0000, bmanning@karoshi.com wrote:
ULA-central is NOT intended to be uses as IPv6 PI.
but there is no way to stop it from becoming so.
What makes that different from any other randomly selected block of addresses if you don't apply some form of filter? The current routing-architecture applied to v6 will blow up in our face sooner or later without improved mechanisms to prevent excessive de-aggregation and unauthorised use of unallocated blocks. I'm no fan of private addressing, but it doesn't seem awfully hard to include the handling of ULA-central in such a solution. //per