On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 7:41 PM Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>>> C) IPv4 waiting list priority follows the size of existing
>>> allocations for the LIR. The lower amount of allocations, starting
>>> with zero, the higher the priority.
>>
>> if the purpose of new allocations is to allow entry, why would an LIR
>> with any existing allocation be given more?
>
> That would only happen if there are zero new entrants, as an LIR with any
> existing allocation would have a lower priority on the waiting list.

i asked why, not how.  imiho, the list should be for *new* entrants,
period.
 
If there are no new entrants, why should any available netblocks be kept unavailable for entrants who request additional netblocks?

Not that I think it will ever happen ...

--
Jan