On 19 mrt 2008, at 16:40, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
Filiz Yilmaz wrote:
We encourage you to send your comments to address-policy- wg@ripe.net before 16 April 2008.
I strongly oppose this (2008-01) proposal for the reasons James A. T. Rice has given. Why would we want to forward all the messy swamp space issues we have in IPv4 to IPv6?
I abstain from voting on 2008-02, I don't think it is necessary to push address space to people who don't use it. No size fits everyone, getting PAv6 is easy enough (especially since 2006-02) and allocations serve as good indicator for the growth of IPv6. Also I suspect this will create issues with the scoring system for people who suddenly have to pay for address space they didn't even want. But if the community thinks that this is a good move then go ahead.
Can't add much more as 'I fully agree', it seems as bad as the goold old classfull days and /8's. Groet, MarcoH