19 Apr
2011
19 Apr
'11
2:50 p.m.
Tim Chown wrote:
On 15 Apr 2011, at 11:28, boggits wrote:
On 15 April 2011 10:22, Emilio Madaio <emadaio@ripe.net> wrote:
A proposed change to the RIPE Document ripe-512,"IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy", is now available for discussion.
You can find the full proposal at:
Why should a company require PIv6 addressing when the task of renumbering within IPv6 space has become so simple?
I'm interested: how simple do you think it has become?
In particular, when most of the (originally conceived and RFC'd) support functionality in DNS - has been removed in the meantime... Wilfried.
Tim