Dear Vladislav,

It is not just "may". It is real case. 

Permanenent transfer cost 10USD per 1 IP. It is too high. We won't pay this money.

We ready pay monthly. It this case the best way to give legal IPs for us - make "sub allocation". But we have restricion in policy - another LIR can sub-allocate only /20 every twelve months. This is too small size. While we need assign now in several times more. And as soon as we will assign this space - we will receive additional requests, but the same supplier by current policy can't give us additional networks while he can do it only one time in twelve months. 

About "may" - it was an example when can be sub-allocated all space. While Gert Doering wrote about this case.

--
Kind regards,
Alexey Ivanov
LeaderTelecom B.V. Team


11.10.2012 14:51 - написал(а):
And for this very special “may” we should treat the whole existing idea as obsolete?
 
Regards,
Vladislav Potapov
IIAT, Ltd.
Ru.iiat
 
From: LeaderTelecom B.V. [mailto:info@leadertelecom.nl]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 2:35 PM
To: Potapov Vladislav
Cc: address-policy-wg@ripe.net
Subject: Re: [Ticket#2012092701011684] [address-policy-wg] FW: Sub-allocations - fast and simple re-using IP-addresses
 
Dear Vladislav,

It is just one case. Anyway may be some company started big telecom project which was paused and they have IPs which they can't use in this moment. 

--
Kind regards,
Alexey Ivanov
LeaderTelecom B.V. Team



11.10.2012 12:37 - написал(а):
>For example, in Russia you need 1,5-2 years from incorporation until receving all permissions (licenses, etc.)
>from goverment to provide telecommunication services. In this case company can sub-allocate all space for some time.
>Alexey Ivanov
 
I think this message is irrelevant (as soon as the new company won’t have much to sub-allocate) and misleading in the terms of time margins for beginners.
 
Regards,
Vladislav Potapov
IIAT, Ltd.
Ru.iiat