Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignment Size)

14 Feb 2007

      You are right, thanks for spotting it!

It should have read "...receiving PA is not raised to /24, too...

Wilfried.

Gert Doering wrote:
...
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 05:41:39PM +0000, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote:
...
- on a more general note, as long as the minimum assignemt size for customers
receiving PA is raised to /24, too, this proposal is a real incentive to go
for PI instead of PA.
A "not" is missing somewhere in this sentence, but I think the intended
meaning is clear :)
(not commenting on the policy proposal itself)
Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair