pekkas@netcore.fi (Pekka Savola) wrote:
Do you really think big is good, small is bad, and just the big ISP's will promote IPv6 ? [...]
Why do you think you require a /32 to "promote IPv6". Don't answer.. it was a rhetoric question :)
I'm not sure whether you've gotten notice of the issue not being the size, but access to a prefix _at all_. Your sarcasm seems out of place...
My own, small consulting company (with dozens of customers) can certainly promote v6, but I have no delusions of grandeour that it would be best from the global perspective to allow such or even larger companies, whether calling themselves ISPs or not, to obtain a /32.
Would you - if I may ask - believe "such or even larger companies" to be eligible for an independently routable prefix at all, or, more clearly spoken, eligible for a slot int the global routing table? Under what circumstances would your idea of eligibility change? Elmar. -- "Begehe nur nicht den Fehler, Meinung durch Sachverstand zu substituieren." (PLemken, <bu6o7e$e6v0p$2@ID-31.news.uni-berlin.de>) --------------------------------------------------------------[ ELMI-RIPE ]---