Hi, On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 04:13:15PM +0200, Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN wrote:
Those being said, I'm in favour of the proposal. Just one reserve on wording of the assignment of "dust" (less than /24): if a request (for smaller than /24) is being made before the reserved pool exhaustion, will it be taken from he reserved pool or from the "dust" ?
Does this matter? Seriously: an IXP would only ever receive a "smaller than /24" assignment if they ask for it. And if they ask for it ("a /27 is sufficient enough, we're a small Island and there are only 10 ISPs here"), will it make a difference if they receive a dust-/27 or something from the IXP pool? (I could see arguments either way - so far the proposal is leaving it as an implementation detail to the NCC) Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279