On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
We've consciously decided that our last-/8 policy is a "no return" policy, to ensure new entrants in the market can still have *some* IPv4, even if they come in 5 years or 10 years time from now.
If you think you can convince the community that we should now go and change it back, well, this is what the policy development process is for - but I don't think the chances are good. Of course everyone wants more IPv4 addresses, but nobody wants anyone *else* to take away those last bits from him...
I am a bit late to the game, but I think this is the perfect summary and I would be forced to argue and vote against any policy proposal which wants to change the status quo regarding last /8. Sorry, Richard